Archive for the 'Communism' Category



Industry is […] producing a “new model” every two years […] resorting to consumers’ private garbage cans for the deposit of useless, but expensive, profit-making wrappings.

Millions in effort, time and investments are wasted on built-in obsolescence, on planned wear and tear, so that the refrigerators, electric razors, stockings, toys, or light bulbs fall apart earlier than necessary[.] 
–Ulrike Meinhof, 1968

Meinhof was murdered before she could see the rise of smartphones, but her words do have a prophetic ring. All her columns are published as Everybody Talks about the Weather…We Don’t (Seven Stories Press, New York, 2008), an interesting book spoiled only by the usual anti-communist rant that her idiot daughter wrote and imposed on the publisher. I warmly recommend it to people who want to see how the seed of the current capitalist dystopia were already sowed in the 60’s. All of it was there: wars waged under weak excuses, consumerism, all-engulfing “conservative” media, calling demonstrators “terrorists”, censorship, emergency laws. It was just on a smaller, more humane scale.


The Myth of Islamosocialism

One of the wonders of linguistics today is that most Tea Party voters–the kind of people who can hardly spell their own name–can generally spell the 7-syllable word “Islamosocialism”. It is ironic that this show of multisyllabic prowess is wasted on a concept that is vastly imaginary. The theory goes: socialists (a term which, in the mind of the radical right, is freely interexchangeable with “communists”, “liberals” and “not quite as radical right-wingers”) are a fifth column of international Islamism, and help promote it in every country. The concept has always been shaky, and has never been so much so as now: the so-called Arab Spring, driven by the Muslim Brotherhood is erasing every trace of Marxist policies in most of the Middle East and Northern Africa, with approval, military and diplomatic help from the NATO.

Not that this is new: Muslims received support from the US and their lackeys in Indonesia (1965), Afghanistan (1978), Bosnia (1991) and Kosovo (1999) against Marxist governments. A decades-old feud also pits the Marxist Fatah against the Islamist Hamas in the Palestinian Territory; the latter actually allied itself with Israel (which it vowed to destroy) rather than co-operate with a left-wing group. Examples of alliances between Islamist movements and Marxist ones are few, far between and unsuccessful:

  • during the Russian Civil War, a Tatar Islamic sect, the Waïsi Movement, supported the Red Army. It was then suppressed by the Soviet authorities in the 30’s. Stalin, in that period, suppressed pretty much anything, generally without any valid reason, so there is no saying how the matter would have ended had the Soviet Union had a sane leader. At any rate, Tatars generally supported the Nazis from then on.
  • during the Iranian revolution, the non-atheistic Marxist movements (i.e., those that were Marxist in name only) united with the clergy against the Shah. Immediately after the revolution, they were first marginalized, then suppressed with violence. Something very similar is happening in Morocco.
  • during the Gulf War, the somewhat socialist-inspired Saddam Hossein made a half-arsed appeal to Muslims to help him against the US troops. It didn’t really work, save for antagonizing Muslims and Americans after the war. The end result, some 12 years later, was the toppling of the Hossein government by an alliance of Americans and Islamists, and its replacement by what is substantially a Muslim theocracy: the new Iraqi constitution, written with the blessing of the US, includes the clause that “no law can be that contradicts the fixed principles of Islam” along with an ambiguous ban on “Saddamist” parties that can very well be used to suppress any left-wing movement.

Where does the myth stem from, then? Well, from Europe, really. European right wing parties generally draw much of their support, in spite of generally unpopular social and economic policies, from their purported stance against immigration, and immigration of staunch Muslims is almost invariably its most visible aspect. Left wings, which, as Stephen Gowans rightly points out, are more or less lost, try to find a sense of identity not only in opposing this stance, but also by courting Muslim voters (truth to be said, they often try to court Christian and Jewish voters as well). This is foolish, of course—Marxism is not compatible with any of the monotheistic religions, and immigration is an instrument of the Capital to reduce wages, deflect attention and hostility from the ruling classes and dilute the voting pool with elements that haven’t had any education in Marxist principles—but it has made it so that a number of people, most of which American, immediately associate anti-capitalism with pro-Islamism.

In the end, any alliance between Islamism and Socialism is very much like the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact: intrinsically unstable, politically impossible and only feasible in the eyes of those who dislike both. But the very existence of the concept, tenuous as it may be, is another sad memento of a Left that can’t be true to itself.


Karl Marx Bashes the Chinese Communist Party

And just to convince you all that I am not the only communist disapproving of the Chinese approach:

Karl Marx Bashes the Chinese Communist Party.

Incidentally, this is also a good video for your average red-scared who has no idea about what Marxism is about.


An Encounter in Eastern Europe

A few months ago, I found myself in Warszawa, talking to a bitter old man. Said bitter old man was some kind of vice-president at a local semiconductor factory He wasn’t cheerful: his factory, with its about 200 employees, had been bought by a Danish group, which had put in charge of the whole place a Dane with half his years, and ten times his salary. To add insult to injury, I read between the lines, the youngster had married the factory’s choicest laska. Crisis had then hit the Danish group as well, and people were being fired. But, the bitter old man declared (once he had learnt I was living in Denmark) the worst was when they were under communism. I thought I’d enquire. Maybe semiconductors weren’t popular with Russians: after all, their computers sucked. The following, actual dialogue was rather surreal:

TCS: How so?
BOM: We worked for the military…
TCS (surprised): Didn’t they put a lot of resources in it?
BOM: Oh yes, we had more than 2500 people working here!
I couldn’t quite get out of him what made the factory worse during communism–particularly for the 2300-and-counting unemployed. I suspect many in Eastern Europe say this kind of thing to get Brownie points: it has usually absolutely nothing to do with why they don’t want communism back. The real reason is that capitalism is, as hinted before, a religion. But this will be the subject of future posts: stay tuned.